Guddu Ansari @ Gooddu Ansari v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.69220 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-45 Year-2025 Thana- HARSIDHI District- East Champaran ====================================================== Guddu Ansari @ Gooddu Ansari S/O Late Mastkim Ansari @ Late Mustakim Ansari Village- Bisunpura, P.S.- Harsidhi, Distt.- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Ms. Khushi Awadh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Nawal Kishore Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 25-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with S.T. No. 620 of 2025 arising out of Harsidhi P.S. Case No. 45 of 2025 instituted for the offences under Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
3. Accusation against the petitioner is of commission of murder of the informant's husband.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. Learned counsel further submitted that petitioner is the son of the deceased. It is submitted that the incident occurred in the heat of passion during a sudden family quarrel, without any
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69220 of 2025(3) dt.25-11-2025 2/2 intention or premeditation to cause death. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 21.01.2025 and has one criminal antecedent.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner stating that there is direct allegation against the petitioner of assaulting the deceased and therefore, the petitioner does not deserve to be released on bail.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as also there being direct allegation against the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage.
7. Accordingly, the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner is, hereby, rejected.
8. Learned Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial. (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Alok Verma/- U T