← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./69341/2025allowed

Kapileshwar Thakur @ Kapleshwar Thakur v. The State Of Bihar

2025-10-13Mr. Justice Sunil Dutta Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.69341 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-49 Year-2025 Thana- MADHEPUR District- Madhubani ====================================================== Kapileshwar Thakur @ Kapleshwar Thakur S/o Khushi Lal Thakur, R/o Village- Kachhua Madhubani, P.S.- Lakhnour, District- Madhubani. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Saket Tiwary, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Mithlesh Kumar Khare, APP.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 13-10-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. As per prosecution case, there is recovery of 85 litre country made liquor kept in jute sack from the Hero Passion Pro motorcycle which belongs to the petitioner. It is alleged that coaccused Mohd. Qadir who was driving the motorcycle was apprehended on the spot.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case due to being the registered owner of the seized motorcycle. He further submits that the seized motorcycle was borrowed by the co-accused and he had no knowledge about the misuse of his motorcycle by the co-accused. Learned counsel submits that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69341 of 2025(2) dt.13-10-2025 2/2 petitioner was not present on the spot and no incriminating article has been recovered from his conscious possession. He further submits that except the fact that petitioner is owner of the seized motorcycle, there is no material against him and he has no concern with the alleged seized liquor. Learned counsel submits that petitioner has got clean antecedent and he undertakes to cooperate in the investigation and trial.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, in the event of arrest or surrender before the concerned Court within six weeks from today, the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court concerned, Jhanjharpur in connection with Madhepur P.S. Case No.49 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) Ritik/- U T