Patna High CourtCR. MISC./69348/2023dismissed

Ranjeet Kumar Das @ Ranjeet Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2023-12-08Mr. Justice Nawneet Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.69348 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-38 Year-2020 Thana- JAMALPUR District- Munger ====================================================== RANJEET KUMAR DAS @ RANJEET KUMAR S/O KAPILDEV DAS @ UBA DAS R/O VILLAGE- CHHOTI KESHOPUR, P.S- JAMALPUR, DISTT.- MUNGER.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Jyoti Ranjan Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Dr. Ajeet Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 08-12-2023 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned APP for the State.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that, though the earlier regular bail petition of the petitioner was rejected by this Court vide order dated 23.03.2023 in Cr. Misc. No. 64687 of 2022, but he is renewing the prayer for bail as the witnesses, the place of occurrence and manner of occurrence has not been proved in deposition of the witnesses.

3. A report was called for from the court below about the stage of trial. The report has been received which shows that all the witnesses has been examined.

4. All the seven witnesses has been examined including the I.O. and doctor.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69348 of 2023(3) dt.08-12-2023 2/2

5. The trial appears to be on the verge of conclusion, as such, I do not find any fresh ground to reconsider the earlier order, which is hereby rejected.

6. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a poor person and unable to engage a lawyer.

7. The Chairman, District Legal Services Authority, Munger shall ensure that petitioner should not be deprived from access to justice merely because of his poverty.

8. If the trial is not concluded within a period of three months (except due to fault or default of the petitioner or coaccused), the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail.

9. The learned court below is directed not to give date of more than seven days.

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) Kundan/- U T