Master Gond @ Amit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.68542 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-132 Year-2025 Thana- BRAHMPUR District- Buxar ====================================================== Master Gond @ Amit Kumar, aged about 20 years, Male, S/o Ramji Gond @ Ramji Sah, R/o Village - Semra, P.S - Brahmpur, District - Buxar ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Ajit Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Anil Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 09-10-2025 Heard Mr. Ajit Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Anil Kumar, learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in connection with Brahmpur P.S. Case No. 132/2025 registered for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
3. As per the allegation made in the FIR, 9.765 litres of illicit liquor was recovered from a motorcycle bearing Registration No.BR03Q-1273.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. Learned counsel informs that petitioner has given specific information in paragraph no.9
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68542 of 2025(2) dt.09-10-2025 2/3 of the bail application that the petitioner is not the owner of the recovered motorcycle. Name of the petitioner has surfaced in this case on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused /Bablu Kumar and confessional statement made before police has no evidentiary value. Petitioner has clean antecedent.
5. Learned APP for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail.
6. Having considered the rival submissions made on behalf of the parties, as well, having perused the allegation made in the FIR, the learned District Court is directed to call for a report from the District Transport Officer concerned with respect to the actual owner of the vehicle. In that case, the District Transport Officer is directed to submit the report before the learned District Court well within a period of one week. On the basis of report, the learned District Court is directed to verify, as to whether, the vehicle is a stolen one or not and whether it is not registered in the name of the petitioner. If it is found that the motorcycle is not registered in the name of the petitioner and not a stolen one, then in that case, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on prearrest bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned District Court within a period of six weeks from today,
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68542 of 2025(2) dt.09-10-2025 3/3 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Excise Act -2, Buxar / Concerned Court in connection with Brahmpur P.S. Case No. 132/2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.
7. The learned District Court is directed to verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and if it is found that the petitioner is involved in some other cases, as what has been stated in paragraph no.3 of the bail application, this order will automatically lose its force.
8. Further, it is made clear that in case it is found that the motorcycle in question is a stolen one, then in that case also, this order will automatically lose its force. (Purnendu Singh, J) Sanjay/- U T