← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/15490/2024disposed

Ramesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar,

2024-10-21Mr. Justice Nawneet Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15490 of 2024 ====================================================== Ramesh Kumar Son of Devkali Kuwar Resident of Village- Bela, P.O.- Aurangabad (bh), P.S.- Aurangabad, District- Aurangabad. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar, through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Additional Chief Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, Bihar, Patna. 3.

The District Magistrate cum Collector, Aurangabad. 4.

The Additional District Magistrate, Aurangabad. 5.

The Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Aurangabad. 6.

The District Panchayati Raj Officer, Aurangabad. 7.

The Prakhand Panchayati Raj Officer, Prakhand- Aurangabad, DistrictAurangabad. 8.

The Block Development Officer, Aurangabad, District- Aurangabad. 9.

The Circle Officer, Aurangabad, District- Aurangabad. 10.

The Executive Engineer, Local Area Engineering Organisation, Work Division, Aurangabad.

11.

The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Bela, Prakhand- Aurangabad, DistrictAurangabad. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rakesh Kumar, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Saroj Kumar Sharma AC to AG-03 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 21-10-2024 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the Sate.

2. It appears from perusal of Annexure-P/1 that the Circle Officer, Aurangabad has written a letter to the Block Panchayati Raj Officer, Aurangabad mentioning that over some part of the land appertaining to Thana No. 570 Khata No. 120 Khesara No. 968 total area of 7.54 acres which has been entered

Patna High Court CWJC No.15490 of 2024(2) dt.21-10-2024 2/2 in the revenue records as Perti kadim as well as Plot No. 537, the nature of which, has not been mentioned in the revenue records, were identified for construction of the Panchayat Bhavan.

3. The petitioner's grievance is that the land which was identified by the State is suitable for construction of the building of the Panchayat Bhavan but due to some reason, the construction of the building is being delayed.

4. The District Magistrate, Aurangabad is directed to look into the matter and expedite it.

5. With these observations, this writ petition is disposed of.

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) Nirmal/AKV U