Babloo Kumar @ Babloo Yadav @ Santosh Kumar Yadav @ Babloo @ Santosh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.18903 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -133 Year- 2015 Thana -NIMCHAKBATHANI District- GAYA ====================================================== Babloo Kumar @ Babloo Yadav @ Santosh Kumar Yadav @ Babloo @ Santosh Kumar, Son of Naresh Yadav, Resident of Village-Sekhpura, P.S. Nimchak Bathani, District Gaya .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Lilawati Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Satyadev Prasad Singh Yadav, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 11-04-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner is in custody since 31.10.2017 in connection with Nimchak Bathani P.S. Case No.133 of 2015 registered for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 109, 302 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Considering that now charge has been framed and the petitioner has already been in custody for over 15 months, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.D.J.-IVth, Gaya, in connection with Neemchak Bathani P.S. Case No.133 of 2015,subject to the following conditions:

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18903 of 2018 (2) dt.11-04-2018 2/2

(1) One of the bailors will be his own blood relative, preferably, father, mother, brother, sister and/or his wife.

(2) The petitioner shall not indulge himself in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(3) The petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of his failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned court concerned.

(4) The petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (Anjana Mishra, J) PNM U T