← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./71741/2024bail granted

Rakesh Thakur v. The State Of Bihar

2024-09-27Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.71741 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1322 Year-2023 Thana- KHAJANCHI HAT District- Purnia ====================================================== Rakesh Thakur Son of Kulanand Thakur Resident of Harda Bazaar PS- K. Hat Maranga, Dist- Purnea ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Adesh Raj Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Md. Aslam Ansari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 27-09-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in K. Hat (Maranga) P.S. Case No. 1322 of 2023, instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 401, 379, 411, 413, 414 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1-B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that, there is recovery of one country made pistol, one live cartridge and a motorcycle from the possession of co-accused Vikram Kumar.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71741 of 2024(2) dt.27-09-2024 2/3 the petitioner also submits that the arms and other articles were recovered from the possession of co-accused Vikram Kumar. The petitioner is in custody since 02.12.2023 and has got eleven criminal antecedents. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that similarly situated co-accused has been granted regular bail by this Court vide order dated 01.05.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 32796 of 2024. There is no compliance of Section 100 of Cr.P.C.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, taking into account the period of custody undergone by the petitioner and claim based on parity, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with K. Hat (Maranga) P.S. Case No. 1322 of 2023, subject to the following conditions: (I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the family of the petitioner.

(II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71741 of 2024(2) dt.27-09-2024 3/3 fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

(III) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Rajorshi/- U T