Ali Hussain @ Sadam Ansari v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.62735 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-4 Year-2019 Thana- DINARA District- Rohtas ====================================================== ALI HUSSAIN @ SADAM ANSARI Son of Nazabuddin Ansari Resident of Village- Gopalpur, P.S.- Dinara (Bhanas), District- Rohtas at Sasaram. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Chhote Lal Mishra For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Amarendra Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 15-10-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Dinara (Bhanas) P.S.Case No.4 of 2019 , registered for offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3⁄4 of the D.P.Act.
Petitioner happens to be husband . There is allegation of demand of Rs.03 lac and for that subjected her to cruelty. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the allegation is false and concocted as he is still ready to keep her with dignity and care and that stand he has taken before the learned court below also.
Heard learned A.P.P. and perused the impugned order, from which it appears that the steps for reconciliation was
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.62735 of 2019(2) dt.15-10-2019 2/2 taken by the learned Sessions Judge, Rohtas at Sasaram also but that failed.
Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned SDJM, Bikramganj (Rohtas) in connection with Dinara (Bhanas) PS Case no.04/19, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 438
(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
With the above direction, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T