Ram Babu Mahto v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.496 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -13 Year- 2017 Thana -HAYAGHAT District- DARBHANGA ======================================================
1. Ram Babu Mahto S/o Chandra Mahto, R/o Village- Rasulpur, P.S.- Hayaghat, District- Darbhanga (Bihar).
.... .... Appellant/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant/s : Mr. Vinay Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Binay Krishna, SPP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 09-03-2018 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
This is an appeal under Section 14(A)(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 against the refusal of prayer for bail by the learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge (S.C./S.T. Act), Darbhanga, in connection with Hayaghat Police Station Case No.13 of registered under Sections 420/406/467/468/471/120B/341/323/354A/506/504/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3(1)(s)/3(1)(r)/3(1)(w) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.
Allegation against the petitioner is of cheating to the informant by inducing her to deposit money with the fictitious
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.496 of 2018 (3) dt.09-03-2018 P2/ Bank. Appellant is in custody since 20.12.2017. Submission is that the parties have entered into compromise.
Considering the aforesaid fact, let the appellant, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court-below where the case is pending in connection with the aforesaid case, with condition that the appellant shall fully cooperate with the investigation/trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the appellant. Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside and appeal is allowed.
(Birendra Kumar, J) Mkr./- U T