← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./78127/2023allowed

Md. Haider @ Haider Ansari @ Haider v. The State Of Bihar

2023-12-06Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.78127 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-243 Year-2023 Thana- ARA MUFFSIL District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Md. Haider @ Haider Ansari @ Haider S/O Naim Ansari R/O Ghegta, P.OSaraiya, P.S- Ara Muffasil, Distt.- Bhojpur, Bihar- 802313. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Abhishek Anand For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar Sharma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 06-12-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Allegation against the petitioner along with other co-accused persons is that they snatched Rs. 40,000/- from the informant along with his mobile phone.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner is not named in FIR rather his name came during investigation on the basis of confessional statement of other co-accused, namely, Somaru Singh and he has already been granted bail by learned lower

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.78127 of 2023(2) dt.06-12-2023 2/2 Court. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner rather recovery of some stolen article has been made from other co-accused person. A statement has been made in para-3 of this petition that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent.. Moreover, the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 09.06.2023.

5. Learned APP appearing for the state has opposed the prayer of regular bail.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as custody of the petitioner, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Ara Mufassil P.S. Case No. 243 of 2023 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM 7th, Bhojpur, Ara. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Shubham/- U T