Patna High CourtCR. MISC./1119/2023rejected

Ravi Singh @ Ravi Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2023-12-02Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1119 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-32 Year-2019 Thana- BHAGWANPUR District- Vaishali ====================================================== RAVI SINGH @ RAVI KUMAR SINGH Son of Ramdeo Singh Resident of Village - Panapur, P.S.- Bhagwanpur, District - Vaishali. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Abhay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ashok Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 02-12-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Bhagwanpur P.S. Case No. 32 of 2019 instituted for the offence under Sections 341, 386, 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. As per allegation in the FIR, the petitioner along with other accused persons are alleged to have opened fire upon the informant as well as others due to which four persons sustained injury. The alleged occurrence took place on denial of ransom demand which was made by the accused persons.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and committed no offence. He has falsely been implicated in this case. General and omnibus allegation

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1119 of 2023(5) dt.02-12-2023 2/2 leveled against the petitioner. The petitioner was remanded in this case from Bhagwanpur P.S. Case No. 115 of 2020 on 4.6.2022 and since then, he is languishing in judicial custody.

5. Learned APP appearing for the state and learned counsel for the informant have vehemently opposed the prayer of regular bail and submitted that the petitioner is named in the FIR who as well as others have specifically been alleged to open fire due to which four persons have sustained injuries. The petitioner is a notorious person who has got ten criminal antecedents.

6. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and considering the nature of allegation, this court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and, as such, his prayer for bail stands rejected.

7. The trial Court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same as early as possible.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Amandeep/- U T