Ram Vilash Yadav @ Ram Vilas Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.69655 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-302 Year-2024 Thana- BAHERI District- Darbhanga ====================================================== 1.

Ram Vilash Yadav @ Ram Vilas Yadav Son of Naresh Yadav R/O Village - Banaul, P.S- Baheri, District- Darbhanga.

2.

Gully Yadav @ Gulli @ Chandraveer Yadav Son of Ram Vilash Yadav @ Ram Vilas Yadav R/O Village - Banaul, P.S- Baheri, District- Darbhanga. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dhirendra Prasad Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Madhura Nand Jha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 23-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2.

The petitioners seek bail in connection with Baheri P.S. Case No. 302 of 2024, instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 103(1), 85, 238 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

Earlier vide order dated 02-07-2025, passed in Cr. Misc. No. 14477 of 2025, anticipatory bail of the petitioners was rejected by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court.

3.

The prosecution case, in short, is that there is allegation against the accused persons including the petitioners is of torturing and committing murder of the deceased due to

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69655 of 2025(2) dt.23-09-2025 2/3 non-fulfillment of dowry.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the present case. Learned counsel for the petitioners also submits that no specific allegation has been attributed against the petitioners rather the same is general and omnibus in nature. The petitioners have got no concern about the demand of dowry. It is next submitted that the petitioners are father-in-law and brotherin-law of the deceased, respectively and they are separate in mess and business from the husband of the deceased. The petitioners are in custody since 22.07.2025. Petitioner No.1 bears one criminal antecedent, whereas petitioner No2 bears no criminal antecedent. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that similarly situated co-accused have been granted regular bail by this Court vide order dated 25.07.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 50590 of 2025.

5.

Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioners. 6.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and taking into account the period of custody undergone by the petitioners, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69655 of 2025(2) dt.23-09-2025 3/3 7.

Let the petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Baheri P.S. Case No. 302 of 2024, subject to the following conditions: (I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the family of the petitioners.

(II) The petitioners shall appear on each and every date fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioners.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Raj Kishore/- U T