Parshuram Bind @ Pashuram Bind @ Pashuram Vinda v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.67900 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-84 Year-2019 Thana- KARPI District- Arwal ====================================================== Parshuram Bind @ Pashuram Bind @ Pashuram vinda Son of Late Lalu Bind @ Laldeo Bind Resident of Village - Oranipar, P.S.- Karpi, District - Arwal ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pritish Kumar Lal, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Raj Ballabh Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 22-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Karpi P.S. Case No. 84 of 2019 instituted for the offence under Sections 302, 436, 427 & 34 of the Indian Penal Code. 3.

As per prosecution case, on 17.05.2019 a quarrel between children led to an assault by about ten accused persons, causing serious injuries to his family members. The accused also set his house on fire, destroying household articles. During treatment, his father succumbed to injuries on 18.09.2023. 4.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 21-07-2025. Petitioner bears no criminal antecedent, as per disclosure made in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67900 of 2025(2) dt.22-09-2025 2/3 paragraph No. 3 of the bail application.

5.

It has been further submitted by the petitioner's counsel that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case due to village politics and land disputes. The FIR shows that the informant is not an eye-witness, and no specific act is attributed to the petitioner. Independent witnesses, including the deceased's grandson, stated he was not present at the occurrence. The Investigating Officer, upon conclusion of investigation, has not submitted final form against the petitioner, despite which the court below took cognizance and directed summons against the petitioner, causing unwarranted harassment.

6.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. 7.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, period of custody of the petitioner and there being no specific allegation against the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

8.

Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Karpi P.S. Case No.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67900 of 2025(2) dt.22-09-2025 3/3 84 of 2019, subject to the following conditions: (I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the family of the petitioner.

(II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Raj Kishore/- U T