Patna High CourtCR. WJC/82/2018dismissed

Sanjay Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Human Resource Development, Govt.

2019-01-04Mr. Justice Ashwani Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.82 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-40 Year-2017 Thana- NARARI KALA KHURD DistrictAurangabad ====================================================== Sanjay Kumar Singh son of Sri Parshu Ram Singh, resident of village-Amba, P.O.-Saduri, P.S.-Narori Kala, Khurd, District- Aurangabad (Bihar). ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Human Resource Development, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

2. The District Magistrate, Aurangabad

3. The Superintendent of Police, District-Aurangabad

4. The Station House Officer, Police Station- Narari Kalan Khurd, DistrictAurangabad

5. The District Education Officer, Aurangabad.

6. The District Programme Officer (Establishment) Aurangabad.

7. The Block Development Officer-cum- Executive Officer, Panchayat Samiti, Block- Barun ,District- Aurangabad

8. The Block Education Officer, Block Barun, District- Aurangabad. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anirudh Kumar Verma, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Kameshwar Kumar, GP-17 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 04-01-2019 This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for quashing of the FIR of Narari Kalan P.S. Case No. 40 of 2017 registered under Sections 420, 406 and 409 of the Indian Penal Code.

On perusal of the FIR, as contained in Annexure-12 to the present writ petition, it would appear that ingredients of a cognizable offences are attracted.

In that view of the matter, institution of the FIR cannot be held to be bad. Moreover, it has been pointed out by

Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.82 of 2018(3) dt.04-01-2019 2/2 the learned counsel for the petitioner that investigation has already been completed and the police have submitted chargesheet in the case. In that view of the matter, I see no merit in this writ petition. The writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to challenge any order which may be passed by the court below on perusal of the charge-sheet and other materials available on record.

(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J) Md. S/SKSuman.