Chakrapani Dutta Dwivedi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2887 of 2023 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12189 of 2022 ====================================================== Kunti Devi Wife of Late Chakrapani Dutta Dwivedi, Resident of Village - Hakam, P.O. - Hakam, District- Siwan.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through Dr. Rekha Kumari, the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Bihar, Patna.
2.
The Principal Secretary, Dr. Rekha Kumari, Education Department, Bihar, Patna.
3.
Jai Prakash University, Chapra, through its Registrar Prof. (Dr.). Ranjeet Kumar Singh, District-Chapra.
4.
The Vice-Chancellor, Dr. Farooque Ali, Jai Prakash University, Chapra. 5.
The Registrar, Prof. (Dr.) Ranjeet Kumar Singh, Jai Prakash University, Chapra, District-Chapra.
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Shubh Narain Singh, Advocate Mr. S. Khan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Kameshwar Kumar, (GP 17) For the University :
Mr. Manoj Kumar Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 18-07-2025 Heard Mr. Shubh Narain Singh, along with Mr. S. Khan, learned counsels appearing on behalf of the petitioner; Mr. Kameshwar Kumar, learned GP 17 appearing on behalf of the State and Mr. Manoj Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the Jai Prakash University.
2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the University refering to para-7 to 9 of the show cause filed on behalf of the opposite party nos.3-5 submitted that in
Patna High Court MJC No.2887 of 2023(5) dt.18-07-2025 2/2 complaince of the order of this Court, the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed.
3. Considering the aforesaid submission, the present contempt petition is consigned in view of the specific statement made in para-7, 8 and 9 which is reproduced hereinafter: "7. That, it is humbly submitted that, during the pendency of this contempt application, the petitioner has died and his wife Kunti Devi have been substituted in his place and immediately after his death family pension of Rs 40,905/- (Forty thousand nine hundred five) admissible D.A. became fixed and it is regularly being paid vide letter No. A/C PEN - 50, dated 14.06.2024.
8. That, it is also humbly submitted here by that Rs 2,75,533/- (Two lakhs Seventy five thousand five hundred thirty three) has been paid to wards the group insurance along with interest of 12% on 20.06.2024.
9. That, it is humbly submitted that, not only that the arrear of difference of pension as per 7th pay fixation since April 2017 to March 2019 of Rs 3,06,953/- (three lakhs six thousand nine hundred fifty three) and for the period of April 2019 to March 2020 of Rs 2,49,117/- (Two Lakhs forty nine thousand one hundred seventeen) has also been paid and now nothing remains."
4. However, if the petitioner is not statisfied with the payment, she would be at liberty to avail remedy in accordance with law.
(Purnendu Singh, J) Ashishsingh/- U