← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/23013/2019withdrawn

Ram Swarth Sah v. The State Of Bihar

2023-01-31The Chief Justice -,Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.23013 of 2019 ====================================================== Ram Swarth Sah, S/o Sri Parash Nath Sah, Resident of Village- Dih Dasahera, P.s.- Mohiuddinagar, District- Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Rural Works Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 2.

The Police Deputy Inspector General Darbhanga Range, Laheriasarai, Darbhanga 3.

The Senior Superintendent of Police Darbhanga 4.

The Executive Engineer Rural Works Division, Darbhanga, Laheriasarai 5.

The Superintendent Engineer Rural Works Division, Darbhanga 6.

The Assistant Engineer, Rural Works Department, Works Sub Division-2, Darbhanga 7.

The Branch Manager, Bank of India, Branch Darbhanga, Laheriasarai ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Mishra, Advocate Mrs. Manini Jaiswal, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Ajay Kumar Sinha, Sr. Advocate Ms. Minu Kumari, Advocate Ms. Dilkash Khan, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Rakesh Kumar Ranjan, AC to GA-5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Date : 31-01-2023 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s):- " 1. That this is an application for sauciness of an appropriate writ or direction commanding the respondents to release the amount deposited in Khata No. 485010110005428 Bank of India, Darbhaga, Laheriasarai with interest which has been kept held up to be released by the respondents on account of petition file by one Rabindra Thakur

Patna High Court CWJC No.23013 of 2019 dt.31-01-2023 2/2 and another Shailendra Kumar Pandey illegally, arbitrarily."

After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition reserving liberty to the writ petitioner to take recourse to such remedies as are otherwise available in accordance with law. As and when any such process is initiated, the same shall be decided expeditiously within a period of three months.

However, it is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and all issues of facts and law are left open.

The petition stands disposed of as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.

Interlocutory Application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

(Sanjay Karol, CJ) ( Partha Sarthy, J) Rajiv/-ranjan AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date Transmission Date