Munna Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.63044 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-521 Year-2018 Thana- RUNISAIDPUR District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== MUNNA MAHTO Son of Anup Mahto Resident of Thumma, P.S.-Runni Saidpur, District-Sitamarhi.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Hans Lal Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Jitendra Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 18-10-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code registered in connection with Runni Saidpur P.S. Case No. 521/2018.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the backdrop of petty dispute of installation of water tap under the Jal-Nal Yojna. It is submitted that the petitioner has been attributed with assault on the informant on his head with tangari, which is, however, not corroborated by the injury report which discloses injury by hard blunt substance and the injuries are simple in nature. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.

4. Be that as it may, in the event of the petitioner's arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Sitamarhi, in connection with Runni Saidpur P.S. Case No. 521/2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438

(2) Cr.P.C. and also subject to the following further conditions:

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.63044 of 2019(2) dt.18-10-2019 2/2 i. That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner. ii. That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

iii. That the petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

iv. The petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/- U T