Bhim Raut v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.66462 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-175 Year-2025 Thana- PAHARPUR District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1.

Bhim Raut S/o Late Ramdev Raut Resident of village - Mishrain Tola, P.S.- Paharpur, Distt.- East Champaran 2.

Arjun Raut @ Arjun Prasad S/o Late Ramdev Raut Resident of village - Mishrain Tola, P.S.- Paharpur, Distt.- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Shaheen Begum, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 24-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2.

The petitioners seek bail in connection with Paharpur P.S. Case No. 175 of 2025 instituted for the offence under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 118(1), 109(1), 329(4), 303(2), 352 & 74 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3.

Prosecution case, in short, is that on 09.04.2025 at 6:00 P.M., petitioner No.1 ordered to kill the informant, tore her clothes with ill intention, assaulted her and snatched Rs. 3500/- and her gold mangalsutra, while petitioner No.2 attacked her with a gadasa on the head causing bleeding injury.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.66462 of 2025(2) dt.24-09-2025 2/3 4.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the petitioners are in custody since 12.04.2025. Petitioners bear no criminal antecedent, as per disclosure made in paragraph No. 3 of the bail application.

5.

It has been further submitted by the petitioners' counsel that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present case. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that injury is found to be simple in nature, which falsify the allegation levelled against the petitioners. Learned counsel submits that both parties are agnates. There is delay of one day in lodging the FIR. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioners.

6.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioners. 7.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, period of custody of the petitioners and injury being found to be simple in nature, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners.

8.

Let the petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Fifteeen Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Paharpur P.S. Case

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.66462 of 2025(2) dt.24-09-2025 3/3 No. 175 of 2025.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Raj Kishore/- U T