← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./69576/2022allowed

Arjun Kumar@ Arjun v. The State Of Bihar

2023-02-28Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.69576 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-204 Year-2021 Thana- FATUA District- Patna ====================================================== 1.

ARJUN KUMAR@ ARJUN S/o Mahendra Singh R/v- Aryagtola, Kolhar, P.S.- Fatuha, District- Patna 2.

SUDHIR KUMAR@ SUDHIR S/o Mahendra Singh R/v- Aryagtola, Kolhar, P.S.- Fatuha, District- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Manoj Kumar Singh, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Harendra Prasad, APP.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 28-02-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 354(b), 354(d), 504, 506, 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegedly, petitioners are said to have abused the informant. They also misbehaved with her and when her parents along with their relatives went to the house of the petitioners to complain, the petitioners assaulted them too. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. No such occurrence as alleged ever took place. Petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case due to ulterior motive. The

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69576 of 2022(2) dt.28-02-2023 2/2 allegation levelled against the petitioners is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. It is further submitted that the informant and her family used the land of the petitioners for toilet upon which an altercation took place between both the parties. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, as there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned lower Court where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Fatuha P.S. Case No. 204 of 2021, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) divyanshi/- U T