Raushan Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.69548 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-50 Year-2014 Thana- MADHUBAN District- East Champaran ====================================================== Raushan Singh S/O Chandraket Singh @ Chandra Kishor Singh R/O Vill.- Delho, P.S.- Madhuban, Dist.- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/S
Versus
The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Sangeet Deokuliar, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Tarun Prasad Mandal, A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 08-10-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. In the present case, the petitioner seeks bail in connection with S. Tr. No. 1105 of 2023 arising out of Madhuban P.S. Case No. 50 of 2014, registered for the offences under Sections 399, 402, 414 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. As per the prosecution case, secret information was received about assembly of unknown miscreants in the house of co-accused Dipu Singh who were making plan for committing dacoity. A raid was conducted and four other co-accused persons were apprehended who disclosed the name of the petitioner and other co-accused persons who fled away from the spot when the raid was being conducted. From the apprehended co-accused persons knife and mobile phones were recovered. One
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69548 of 2025(2) dt.08-10-2025 2/3 motorcycle was also seized.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. The petitioner was neither caught at the spot nor any incriminating article has been recovered from him. There is no cogent material to show the involvement of the petitioner in the alleged occurrence. It is not believable that informant received information about the assembly of criminals in the house of the co-accused and also came to know about what they were going to plan and execute. The petitioner is a poor person and has been made accused in altogether 17 cases. He is in custody since 26.05.2015 but due to his poverty he could not approach this Court earlier for grant of bail though maximum punishment is of 10 years for the offences as alleged in the FIR. Charge sheet has been submitted.
5. Learned A.P.P. appearing for the State opposes the submission made on behalf of the petitioner.
6. Having regard to the fact and circumstances and submission made on behalf of the parties and considering the period of custody, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each with two sureties of the like amount each
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69548 of 2025(2) dt.08-10-2025 3/3 to the satisfaction of learned Addl. Sessions Judge-4, Motihari, East Champaran/concerned court, in connection with S. Tr. No. 1105 of 2023 arising out of Madhuban P.S. Case No. 50 of 2014, subject to the condition laid down under Section 480(3) of the BNSS and other following conditions:
(i) One of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner.
(ii) The petitioner will remain present on each and every date fixed by the court below, if so required by the learned trial court.
(iii) In case of absence on three consecutive dates or in violation of the terms of the bail, the bail bond of the petitioner will be liable to be cancelled by the court concerned.
(Arun Kumar Jha, J) Anuradha/- U T