Akash Kumar Yadav @ T. T. @ Akash Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.72200 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-750 Year-2023 Thana- LAKHISARAI District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== Akash Kumar Yadav @ T. T. @ Akash Kumar Son of Shri Shrawan Yadav Resident of Village - Gadhi Bishunpur, Ward No.09, P.S. and District - Lakhisarai ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Neeraj Nandan, Advocate Mr.Mukesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Pushpa Sinha.1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 29-10-2024

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has renewed his prayer for grant of regular bail in connection with S.Tr. no. 49 of 2024 arising out of Lakhisarai P.S. Case no. 750 of 2023 registered under sections 25(1-B)(a) and 26(i)(ii) of the Arms Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, a loaded country made katta was recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Further from search of his house, one double barrel gun and two country made kattas with two live cartridges were recovered from a box kept in the house of the petitioner.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the earlier prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected vide order dated 21.3.2024 (Annexure-P/1) passed in Cr. Misc. no. 1502 of 2024 and the learned trial Court was directed to expedite the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.72200 of 2024(2) dt.29-10-2024 2/2 trial. It is submitted that the petitioner has remained in custody for more than a year since 29.9.2023 and charge has been framed in the learned trial Court on 14.3.2024 which is evident from the order of the learned trial Court rejecting the application for bail of the petitioner. The petitioner undertakes to cooperate in the trial.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegations against the petitioner in the F.I.R, the petitioner having remained in custody for more than a year since 29.9.2023 and charge having been framed in the learned trial Court on 14.3.2024, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with S.Tr. no. 49 of 2024 arising out of Lakhisarai P.S. Case no. 750 of 2023 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional District & Sessions Judge-II, Lakhaisarai. (Partha Sarthy, J) Harsh/- U T