← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/1690/2014disposed

Nirmala Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-10-31Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1690 of 2014 ====================================================== NIRMALA KUMARI W/O SURESH PRASAD RESIDENT OF VILLAGEKESHO CHAK, P.O- KESHO CHAK, P.S- HILSA, DISTRICT- PATNA. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar The Principal Secretary Department Of Education Govt. Of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Director Primary Education, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Staff Selection Commission, Patna Through Its Secretary.

4. The Chairman, Bihar Staff Selection Commission, Patna

5. The Secretary, Bihar Staff Selection Commission, Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Premchandra Yadav For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Mujtabaul Haque, GP 12 Mr. Vasant Vikas, AC to GP 12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 31-10-2018 The matter relates to filling up the vacancies of 34,540 teachers pursuant to Advertisement No. 210/2010 published by Bihar Staff Selection Commission (hereinafter referred to as 'the Commission'). The matter was taken to the Supreme Court on different occasions and thereafter the commission has invited objection for preparation of final select list of 2613 candidates out of the total 34,540 vacancies. After inviting objection, the Commission is proceeding ahead to finalize the list.

In view of the aforesaid, no positive direction can be issued in the instant case. The Commission is expected to finalize the list so that appointment can be made on the left over

Patna High Court CWJC No.1690 of 2014(4) dt.31-10-2018 2/2 2613 vacancies. The Court hopes and trusts that the Commission will act in accordance with law and consider the candidature of all eligible candidates in accordance with the principles laid down by the Apex Court, which may include consideration of the case of the petitioner, if it is covered by the decision of the Apex Court.

With the aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed of.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) mrl./- U