Yes Jeet Raj @ Yashjeet Raj v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.69760 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-580 Year-2022 Thana- CIVIL LINE District- Gaya ====================================================== YES JEET RAJ @ YASHJEET RAJ Son of Sujeet Kumar Resident of village - Paraiya, P.S.- Paraiya, District - Gaya.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anil Kumar Saxena For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Md. Matloob Rab ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 27-03-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner has prayed for bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 366A of the Indian Penal Code.

The allegation against the petitioner along with another is of abducting the daughter of the informant, when the informant's daughter had gone to monestry Nigam at Bodhgaya, where NCC camp was organized.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has falsely been implicated in this case. Petitioner is not named in the FIR. He submitted that the statement of the victim girl has been recorded u/s 164 of the Cr.P.C., which transpires that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69760 of 2022(3) dt.27-03-2023 2/2 victim girl has been recovered and she stated in her statement that she is not whispered about the complicity of this petitioner. The petitioner is a coach of Badminton at Gurukul Academy under the State of Maharastra. She further stated that nothing wrong has been committed by the petitioner against her. The petitioner is no concern with the present case. He has got no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail application. It is further submitted that the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 09.09.2022.

Learned APP appearing for the state has opposed the prayer of regular bail.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Civil Line P.S. Case No. 580 of 2022 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M.-1st Class, Gaya. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Arish/- U T