Bidyanand Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.63010 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-145 Year-2000 Thana- SUPAUL DistrictSupaul ====================================================== 1.

BIDYANAND YADAV Son of Late Sheo Narayan Yadav Resident of Village - Gopalpur Siray, P.S.- Supaul, District - Supaul. 2.

Kedar Yadav Son of Late Buchan Yadav Resident of Village - Gopalpur Siray, P.S.- Supaul, District - Supaul.

... ... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners :

Mr. Prabhat Kumar Singh, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party:

Mr. Anuj Kumar Shrivastava, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 17-10-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 341, 323, 457, 380, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code registered in connection with Supaul P.S. Case No. 145 of 2000.

3. At the outset, learned APP submits that the F.I.R. has been filed as far back as in the year 2000, but the petitioners have approached this Court in the year 2019 and the cognizance has been taken in the year 2001 and there does not appear to be any immediate apprehension of arrest of the petitioners.

4. Considering that the petitioners have not shown any

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.63010 of 2019(2) dt.17-10-2019 2/2 cause for immediate apprehension of arrest and the anticipatory bail petition has been filed about 18 (eighteen) years after filing of the F.I.R., this Court is not inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. The anticipatory bail petition stands dismissed.

(Vikash Jain, J) Ibrar//- U T