Amanullah Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.68861 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-300 Year-2024 Thana- JOGAPATTI District- West Champaran ====================================================== Amanullah Ansari S/O Bachchan Miya Resident of Village- Pipra Lohar Toli, P.S.- Yogapatti, Dist.- West Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjeev Kumar Shrivastava For the State :

Mr.J.N. Thakur, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 07-11-2025 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner is seeking regular bail in connection with Yogapatti P.S. Case No. 300 of 2024, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 103/61(2)(a)/3(5) of the BNS.

3. As per allegation, the marriage of the deceased was solemnized with the petitioner 17 years prior to lodging of the FIR. The petitioner had love and affection with a neigbour namely, Sabina Praveen and for that reason, the accused persons committed murder of the deceased by pressing her throat.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that, admittedly, the victim had committed suicide and the police have found it to be a case of suicide. The allegation against the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68861 of 2025(3) dt.07-11-2025 2/2 petitioner, who is the husband of the deceased, is that he abetted the suicide of his wife. He has further submitted that the deceased died after 17 years of marriage and there is no question of collusion or abetment of suicide. Both the sons of the deceased, during investigation, stated about the innocence of the petitioner. The petitioner is physically disabled and unable to walk without support.

5. On the other hand, the learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for bail.

6. Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above-named, is directed to furnish bail bond and on doing so, the court below shall release the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, West Champaran, Bettiah in connection with Yogapatti P.S. Case No. 300 of 2024, subject to the following condition that the petitioner will appear in the court on each and every date fixed by the trial court till framing of charges.

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) Nirmal/- U T