← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/17125/2022disposed

Jitendra Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2023-05-02Mr. Justice Purnendu Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17125 of 2022 ====================================================== Jitendra Kumar Singh son of Ram Rakshya Singh, resident of A-24, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya, P.O. and P.S. Bodh Gaya, District- Gaya, the retired Professor of Post Graduate Department of Hindi, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya, District- Gaya.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Director Higher Education, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4.

The Vice Chancellor Magadh University, Bodh Gaya. 5.

The Registrar, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya.

6.

The Finance Officer, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya. 7.

The Finance Advisor, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vijay Kumar Singh, Advocate For the M.U.

:

Mr.Sunit Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 02-05-2023 Heard Mr. Vijay Kumar Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Sunit Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the Magadh University.

2. Petitioner has filed the present writ application for payment of remaining amount of gratuity (Rs.10 lacs), earned leave and arrear of difference of pension with applicable rate of interest.

3. Registrar, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya is directed to look into the grievance of the petitioner within a

Patna High Court CWJC No.17125 of 2022(2) dt.02-05-2023 2/2 period of three weeks and make payment of all the admitted retiral dues i.e. remaining amount of gratuity (Rs.10 lacs), earned leave and arrear of difference of pension with applicable rate of interest.

4. The Registrar must take note of the fact that all the dues which have not been paid to the petitioner are admitted dues and therefore he must not take any technical plea to delay the payment, not beyond a period of four weeks.

5. The petitioner, if so advised, may file a detailed representation within the aforesaid period.

6. The Registrar is directed to communicate to the petitioner at his own level that all the due amount payable to the petitioner have been paid in his account.

7. With the above observation and direction, the writ petition stands disposed of.

(Purnendu Singh, J) chn/- U