Rajendra Singh @ Gulzar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 65508 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-109 Year-2019 Thana- EKMA District- Saran ====================================================== 1.

RAJENDRA SINGH @ GULZAR SINGH, son of Late Sitaram Singh, 2.

Rahul Singh, Son of Rajendra Singh, 3.

Amar Singh @ Kanhjee Singh, Son of Late Sita Ram Singh, All are Residents of Village - Karanpura, P.S.- Ekma, District- Saran at Chapra.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Nawal Kishore Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Rajendra Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 05-03-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 447, 341, 323, 324, 325, 307, 354, 379, 504, 506, 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioners along other accused persons is of assaulting the informant and other persons by lathi, danda rod etc.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent, they have not committed such offence as alleged. The petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case due to previous enemity. Allegation is general and omnibus and injuries are simple in nature against the petitioners, but the injury report of Babita Devi is grievous in nature and there is specific

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 65508 of 2019(4) dt.05-03-2020 2/2 allegation against Rahul Singh that he assaulted the informant Babita Devi by rod on her left hand due to which her hand broken and she fallen on the earth.

In the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner nos. 1 and 3, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the order, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (rupees twenty thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M.-1st, Saran at Chapra in connection with Ekma P.S. Case No. 109 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

In the aforesaid facts and circumstances, there is specific allegation against the petitioner no. 2, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner no. 2 on bail. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner no. 2 is rejected in aforesaid matter. Accordingly, the application is dismissed.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) amitkumar/- U T