Vicky Kumar Yadav @ Digvijay Kumar And ORS v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.7327 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-101 Year-2017 Thana- DARIHAT District- Rohtas ======================================================
1. Vicky Kumar Yadav @ Digvijay Kumar, son of Ram Pravesh Singh Yadav,
2. Lakshman Singh, Son of Hari Narayan Singh Yadav,
3. Pankaj Kumar @ Vivek Kumar, Son of Ram Pravesh Singh Yadav.
4. Ram Pravesh Singh Yadav @ Ram Pravesh Singh, Son of Late Lal Jee Singh.
5. Bhola Singh Yadav @ Bikram Kumar, Son of Late Ramadhar Singh Yadav.
6. Jayram Singh Yadav @ Jai Ram Singh, Son of Late Ramadhar Singh Yadav.
7. Guddu Kumar @ Janendra Kumar, Son of Jimdar Singh, 1 to 7 , All resident of Village- Nand Tola Hurka, P.S Darihat, DistrictRohtas at Sasaram.
8. Rintu Singh @ Rintu Kumar, Son of Shiv Shankar Singh.
9. Sintu Singh @ Sintu Kumar, Son of Shiv Shankar Singh, 8 & 9 both R/o Village- Barkap, P.S. Darihat, District- Rohtas at Sasaram.
10. Jaswant Singh @ Jaswant Raj Son of Bal......................... Singh, Resident of Village Sanath Bigha, P.S. Dalmiya Nagar District- Rohtas at Sasaram. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Atul Chandra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Dr. Indiwar Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 17-02-2018 Learned counsel for the petitioners informs the court that during the pendency of this application, the petitioner no.8 Rintu Singh @ Rintu Kumar was arrested by the police and as such the application for anticipatory bail on behalf of the petitioner no.8 has now become infructuous.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State.
Petitioners are apprehending arrest in connection with
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.7327 of 2018(2) dt.17-02-2018 2/2 Darihat P.S. Case No. 101 of 2017 for the offence under sections 147, 148, 149, 186, 341, 323, 504, 506, 337, 338, 322, 427, 333, 307, 120(B), 353 of the Indian Penal Code.
The name of the petitioners surfaced on the statement of Chouwkidar that they were involved in illegal mining. From perusal of the FIR, it appears that Chouwkidar has named 35 persons. In addition thereto he has mentioned about the involvement of 34 unknown.
In view of the fact that omnibus allegation has been levelled against the petitioners, the court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners named above in the event of arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of one month on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram, in connection with Darihat P.S. Case No. 101 of 2017on the condition that the bailors should be family members of the petitioners and other conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Ravi/- U