Shekhar Suman v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.67546 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-372 Year-2019 Thana- ALAMGANJ District- Patna ====================================================== SHEKHAR SUMAN Son of Sri Gopal Prasad Resident of Bikash Colony, Road No.- 3, P.S.- Alamganj, District - Patna, Pin Code - 800006. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Renu Kumari Wife of Shekhar Suman D/O Sarvadanand Singh, Resident of Bikash Colony, Road No.- 3, P.S.- Alamganj, District - Patna, Pin Code - 800006. At present residing at Village - Srinagar, P.O. and P.S. - Mashaurh, Patna, Bihar, Pin Code - 804452.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rohit Mishra For the Opposite Party/s :

Md. Ataur Rahman, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 18-01-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Alamganj P.S. Case No. 372 of 2019 registered under Sections 341, 323, 325, 498A and 509/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that earlier prayer of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail was rejected by this Court vide order dated 28.10.2021 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 660 of 2021. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67546 of 2022(6) dt.18-01-2023 2/2 opposite parties opposed the prayer of the petitioner by contending that earlier prayer of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail was rejected on merit on 28.10.2021 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 660 of 2021. Now, there is no fresh ground in the present case. Hence, the petitioner does not deserve to be enlarged on anticipatory bail.

Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case as well as the submissions advanced on behalf of the State, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, prayer of the petitioner is rejected. (Arvind Srivastava, J) shailendra/- U T