← Library
Patna High CourtCR. APP (SJ)/4614/2023rejected

Kundan Kumar @ Kundan Kunwar @ Kundan Kuwar v. The State Of Bihar

2024-01-04Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.4614 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-104 Year-2023 Thana- BALIYA District- Begusarai ====================================================== KUNDAN KUMAR @ KUNDAN KUNWAR @ KUNDAN KUWAR Son of Hari Kumar @ Hari Kunwar @ Hari Kuwar R/o vill - Bhawanandpur, ward no. 01, P.s. - Ballia, Dist. - Begusarai ... ... Appellant/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Pawan Paswan Son of Late Bachi Paswan R/o vill - Bhawanandpur, ward no. 01, Post Masudanpur, P.S. - Ballia, Distt. - Begusarai ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr.Sandip Kumar Gautam For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Sadanand Paswan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 04-01-2024 Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned Special Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The instant appeal has been filed by the appellant against the order dated 18.08.2023 passed by learned Exclusive Special Judge SC/ST PoA Act, Begusarai whereby the prayer for bail of the appellant in connection with Ballia P.S. Case no. 104 of 2023 under Section 302, 34 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 27 of the Arms Act and sections 3(i)(r)(s), 3(2)(va) of SC/ST PoA Act was rejected.

3. According to prosecution case, the informant has alleged that the appellant abused and committed murder of her wife by shot fire, while he and his wife were going to attend marriage ceremony.

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.4614 of 2023(3) dt.04-01-2024 2/2

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the appellant that appellant has been falsely implicated in this case. The appellant has not committed any offence. The appellant has not abused the informant in public view so no offence is made out under the provisions of the SC/ST Act against him. It is also submitted that the appellant is languishing in judicial custody since 09.05.2023.

5. The appeal for bail is opposed by learned Spl. P.P. for the State and submitted that there is direct allegation against the petitioner of opening fire upon the wife of the informant, resulting into her death, this court is not inclined to enlarge the appellant on bail and, as such, his prayer for bail stands rejected.

The appeal stands disposed off.

The trial Court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same as soon as possible.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) manishkumar/- U T