Raj Keshwar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6394 of 2018 (2) dt.01-02-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.6394 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -197 Year- 2017 Thana -KARAKAT District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ====================================================== Raj Keshwar Singh, son of Suraj Singh @ Surya Singh, r/o. vill Khairabhudhar, P.S. Bikramganj, Dist. Rohtas at Sasaram. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Om Prakash Upadhyay For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nityanand Tiwary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 01-02-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 13.09.2017 in connection with Karakat P.S. Case No. 197 of 2017 for the alleged offences under Sections 414, 25 (1-b)a, 26/35 of the Arms Act.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated on mere suspicion and only because the papers of the Bolero vehicle could not be produced at the time of inspection. There is no material to indicate that any case has been instituted for theft of the said Bolero vehicle. No arms have been recovered from the petitioner. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.

4. Be that as it may, having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Bikramganj, in connection with Karakat P.S. Case No. 197 of 2017 on the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6394 of 2018 (2) dt.01-02-2018 offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iii) That the petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(iv) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/BT U T