Vikash Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.53209 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -70 Year- 2007 Thana -KINJAR District- JEHANABAD ====================================================== Vikash Kumar son of Mathura Passwan, resident of village Rasalpur, P.S. Parasbigha, District Jehanabad.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Ram Sumiran Roy ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 15-11-2017 heard the parties.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Kinjar P.S.Case No.70 of 2017 registered for offences punishable under Sections 25(a-a)b, 26 of the Arms Act.

Allegation against the petitioner is about recovery of one cartridge from the possession of the petitioner, as per FIR. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that except recovery of cartridge, there is no other recovery from the possession of the petitioner. He has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody for four months.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.53209 of 2017 (2) dt.15-11-2017 2/2 Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Sanjeev Kuamr, A.C.J.M.-III, Arwal in connection with Kinjar P.S.Case No.70 of 2017. With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and in the event of failure to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bond.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T