Manoj Kumar Singh @ Manoj Singh v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.456 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -784 Year- 2017 Thana -BHABHUA District- BHABHUA (KAIMUR) ======================================================

1. Manoj Kumar Singh @ Manoj Singh, son of Late Ramchandra Singh, resident of Village- Adhaura, P.S. Adhoura, District Kaimur at Bhabua, at present Bhabua, Ward No. 9, P.S. Bhabua, District Kaimur at Bhabua. .... .... Appellant/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Saroj Devi, son of Krishna Paswan, resident of Village- Bhabua, Ward No. 22, P.S. Bhabua, District Kaimur at Bhabua. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s : Mr. Tribhuwan Narayan, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Smt Usha Kumari No-1,SPP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 22-03-2018 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

This is an appeal under Section 14(A)(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 against the refusal of prayer for anticipatory bail by the learned Additional Sessions Judge 1st, Kaimur at Bhabua, in Bhabua Police Station Case No.784 of 2017 registered under Sections 406/354B/504/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(i) (r)(w) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

Occurrence of abuse and attempt to outrage the modesty of the informant took place for the reason that wages were due with the hospital which the appellant was not giving.

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.456 of 2018 (3) dt.22-03-2018 P2/ Submission is that the appellant is also a member of scheduled tribes.

Considering the aforesaid fact, let the appellant, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court-below where the case is pending in connection with the aforesaid case, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure as well as condition that the appellant shall fully cooperate with the investigation/trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the appellant.

Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside and appeal stands allowed.

(Birendra Kumar, J) Mkr./- U T