Sanjeev Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.68229 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-254 Year-2025 Thana- MAHNAR District- Vaishali ====================================================== Sanjeev Paswan Son of Suraj Paswan Resident of Village - Bishanpur, Police Station - Mahnar, District - Vaishali, Bihar. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Deepak Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs. Veena Kumari Jaiswal, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 24-09-2025 Heard Mr. Deepak Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mrs. Veena Kumari Jaiswal, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Mahnar P.S. Case No. 254 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 64, 62, 126(2), 115(2) of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The case of the prosecution is that on 28.06.2025, the petitioner entered into the house of the informant while she was sleeping and it is alleged that he attempted to commit rape on her.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that from perusal of the order of the learned trial court, it will transpire that with the intervention of well-wishers, the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68229 of 2025(2) dt.24-09-2025 2/2 informant agreed to tell the truth, and she has filed a compromised petition. It has also been submitted that the informant lives with her family members in her house, but from perusal of the FIR, it is clear that she raised alarm, her neighbor, namely Puspa Devi, came there, and no family members arrived there. He further submits that a statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in judicial custody since 30.06.2025.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned concerned court/successor court in connection with Mahnar P.S. Case No. 254 of 2025.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T