Raju Sahni v. The State Of Bihar
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.55209 of 2017 (2) dt.15-11-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.55209 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -350 Year- 2016 Thana -MOTIHARI MUFASIL DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ======================================================
1. Raju Sahni Son of Mahendra Sahani, R/o Village- Bochaha, P.S.- Bochaha, District- Muzaffarpur.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prem Prakash Poddar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Parmeshwar Mehta ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 15-11-2017 Earlier prayer for bail of the petitioner was dismissed with a direction to the trial court to expedite the trial and try to conclude the same within a period of seven months and petitioner was given the liberty that if the trial is not concluded within the aforesaid period, he may renew his prayer for bail. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that period of seven months has already expired and petitioner has been in custody since 11.09.2016 and is ready to abide by any condition imposed on him for grant of bail.
Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts and also in view of order dated 06.04.2017, passed in Cr. Misc No. 7134 of 2017, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.55209 of 2017 (2) dt.15-11-2017 Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, East Champaran, Motihari, in connection with East Champaran Muffasil P.S. Case No. 350 of 2016, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.
(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T