Jairam Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.68967 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-69 Year-2025 Thana- Chakki District- Buxar ====================================================== Jairam Yadav Son of Late Bhrigu Nath Yadav Resident of Village - Parasia, P.S.- Chakki, District - Buxar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Shri Niwas Pandey Son of Late Ramnagina Pandey Resident of Village - Parasia, P.S.- Chakki, District - Buxar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shivendra Roy, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms.Pushpa Sinha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 24-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. Petitioner is apprehending arrest in connection with Chakki P.S. Case No. 69 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 329(2), 127(2), 115(2), 352, 109(1) & 3(5) of B.N.S., 2023.

3. As per prosecution case, petitioner and others are said to have assaulted the informant on his head by means of iron rod, as a result of which he sustained injury.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence as alleged in the first information report and he has been falsely implicated

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68967 of 2025(2) dt.24-09-2025 2/3 in this case. It is submitted that there is no specific allegation against the petitioner, rather the allegations levelled are general and omnibus in nature. It is further submitted that the injury sustained by the informant has been found to be simple in nature, as mentioned in the impugned order. In the light of the aforesaid, no offence is made out against the petitioner under section 109 of the B.N.S. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

5. The learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner and submits that petitioner is named accused and he cannot escape from the allegations levelled in the first information report.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, keeping in view clean antecedent of petitioner, there is no specific allegation against the petitioner, injury sustained by the informant is simple in nature, argument advanced on behalf of both sides and also taking into consideration the material available on record, the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Court No. 6, Buxar in connection with Chakki P.S. Case

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68967 of 2025(2) dt.24-09-2025 3/3 No. 69 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Alok Kumar Pandey, J) mcverma/- U T