Jitendra Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.70881 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-208 Year-2024 Thana- NARDIGANJ District- Nawada ====================================================== 1.

Jitendra Kumar S/o- Raj Kumar Yadav Village- Dohra, P.S- Nardiganj, District- Nawada 2.

Vicky Kumar Son of Bindeshwari Mandal Village- Faldu, P.S- Nardiganj, District- Nawada 3.

Mithlesh Yadav @ Mithlesh Kumar Son of Dhaneshwar Yadav VillageDohra, P.S- Nardiganj, District- Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Birendra Kumar, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ram Bilash Roy Raman, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 22-10-2024 Heard the parties.

2.

The petitioners apprehends their arrest in connection with Nardiganj P.S. Case No.208 of 2024, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 121, 303(2), 338, 336(3) of the B.N.S., 2023.

3.

As per the FIR, the police team committed raid in the shop of one Ajay Kumar Gupta and recovered 03 challan and two of them were duplicate. The co-accused Ajay Kumar Gupta disclosed the name of the petitioners and other co-accused persons as his associates.

4.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.70881 of 2024(2) dt.22-10-2024 2/2 petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. They have been falsely implicated in this case. No such occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. There is no specific overt act against the petitioners. Petitioners have no concern with the shop of the co-accused Ajay Kumar Gupta. Petitioners have been made accused merely on the basis of statement of apprehended co-accused. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent.

5.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

6.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case as well as considering the nature of offence, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The prayer for grant of anticipatory bail on their behalf is hereby rejected. 7.

Accordingly, this application is dismissed.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) shikha/- U T