Patna High CourtCR. MISC./27321/2018bail granted

Sunil Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2018-05-18Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.27321 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No. -74 Year- 2016 Thana -BUXAR District- BUXAR ====================================================== Sunil Yadav, Son of Nathuni Yadav, Resident of Village- Budhanpurwa, Police Station- Buxar (Town), District- Buxar, Bihar. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Birendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party: Mr. Jitendra Kr. Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 18-05-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner, who is in custody since 22.03.2016, has renewed his prayer for bail in connection with Buxar (Town) P.S. Case No. 74 of 2016; G.R. No. 421 of 2016 having thrice been rejected by orders dated 29.09.2016, 08.03.2017, 28.02.2018 in Cr. Misc. No. 41033 of 2016, Cr. Misc. No. 10313 of 2017; and Cr. Misc. No. 58166 of 2017, respectively. In the latter case, the bail petition was rejected with liberty to the petitioner to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge.

3. It is submitted that in a subsequent development, charges have now been framed against the petitioner. It is further submitted that there is no chance of tampering with the evidence of the witnesses.

4. Having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case as well as period of custody of the petitioner above named, let him be released on bail on furnishing on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Buxar in connection with Buxar (Town) P.S.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.27321 of 2018 (2) dt.18-05-2018 2/2 Case No. 74 of 2016; G.R. No. 421 of 2016 with the following conditions:

(i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (Vikash Jain, J) B.T/ U