Patna High CourtCR. MISC./54960/2017bail granted

Dilip Kumar Sahni @ Dilip Sahni And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

2017-11-17Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.54960 of 2017 (2) dt.17-11-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.54960 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -292 Year- 2017 Thana -JOKIHAT District- ARRARIA ======================================================

1. Dilip Kumar Sahni @ Dilip Sahni, Son of Bishundeo Sahni,

2. Chandan Kumar Bahardar, Son of Uttam Lal Bahardar,

3. Mukesh Kumar Bahardar, Son of Ramdeo Bahardar, All R/o VillageBathnaha, Bhavanipur, Police Station- Jogbani, District- Araria. .... .... Petitioners/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners/s : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Rana For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Asharaf Ansari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 17-11-2017 The petitioners seek regular bail in connection with Jokihat P.S. Case No. 292 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Section 273/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 38(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. Allegation is of recovery of 125 litres of foreign liquor from a Scorpio vehicle and petitioners were arrested on spot. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that they have falsely been implicated in this case and have no criminal antecedents. Moreover, they have sufficiently been punished for the said offence as they have been in judicial custody since 09.09.2017.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.54960 of 2017 (2) dt.17-11-2017 Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, let the petitioners above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 02nd Additional Sessions Judge cum Special Judge, Araria, in connection with Jokihat P.S. Case No. 292 of 2017, subject to the condition that:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) It is made clear that if the petitioners again found involved in any of the like offences, in future, prosecution will be free to move for cancellation of their bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T