Ram Pravesh Kumar Sinha v. The State Of Bihar Through The Home Secretary Govt. Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2007 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.- Year-0 Thana- District- Nawada ====================================================== Ram Pravesh Kumar Sinha S/O Vijay Kumar Village- Gondapur, Ps. Nawada, Dist. Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar Through The Home Secretary Govt. Of Bihar Bihar 2.

The D.G.P. Bihar Bihar 3.

The D.I.G. Bihar, Patna Zone,Patna Bihar 4.

The Senior Superintendent Of Police, Patna Bihar, Patna 5.

The Officer Incharge Gopalpur, Ps. Patna Bihar, Patna 6.

Rajendra Kumar Sinha S/O Late Ram Briksh Sinha Village- Harnichak, Ps. Beur, Dist. Patna 7.

Mayank Kumar Sinha S/O Rajendra Kumar Sinha Village- Harnichak, Ps. Beur, Dist. Patna ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pramod Kumar Verma, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Deepak Kumar, AC to GP 4 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIBEK CHAUDHURI ORAL ORDER 28-03-2025 It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner purchased a piece of land and after purchase he tried to construct pillars around the said land. While constructing pillars, the private respondents obstructed him and did not permit him to raise pillars. The petitioner informed the matter to the local police station as well as to the Superintendent of Police and other higher officials of the police department. The grievance of the petitioner is that the police department did not take any action by registering any FIR against the private respondents.

Patna High Court CR. WJC No.2007 of 2023(3) dt.28-03-2025 2/2

2. If a person is registered by private respondents against enjoyment of his own land, efficacious relief of the petitioner lies in filing of a proceeding under Section 144 of the CrPC before the learned Executive Magistrate or by filing a suit for permanent and temporary injunction.

3. The allegation, prima facie, does not disclose any cognizable offence where the police authority is bound to register FIR.

4. For the reasons stated above, this Court finds that the instant writ petition is devoid of any merit and accordingly, the same is dismissed. However, the petitioner is at liberty to take necessary action against the respondents in accordance with law, if he feels aggrieved.

(Bibek Chaudhuri, J) Suraj Dubey/- U T