Priyansh Kumar @ Bhola @ Priyash Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.69158 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-191 Year-2025 Thana- AANDAR District- Siwan ====================================================== 1.

Priyansh Kumar @ Bhola @ Priyash Kumar Son of Vishwambhar Bin Resident of Village - Chhajawa P.S. - Ander, Dist. - Siwan. 2.

Nirmal Kumar @ Nirmal Kumar Manjhi S/o Majister Manjhi Resident of Village - Chhajawa P.S. - Ander, Dist. - Siwan. ... ... Petitioners.

Versus

The State of Bihar. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners :

Mr. Gajendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 26-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest for the offences punishable under Sections 126 (2), 115 (2), 303 (2), 109 (1), 352 and 3 (5) of the B.N.S.

3. The allegation in the first information report is that the petitioners assaulted the informant by means of lathi, danda causing injuries to him. The reason behind the occurrence is said to be encroachment of land.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that it would be evident from the first information report that there is general and omnibus allegation of assault and also of snatching away a bag containing cash. It is further submitted that even in view of the allegations, the injuries suffered by the informant, as would be apparent from Annexure-2 to this petition, is simple in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69158 of 2025(2) dt.26-09-2025 2/2 nature caused by hard and blunt substance. It is more in the nature of pain in the back, foot etc. It is further submitted that there is delay of three days in lodging the F.I.R. as the occurrence is said to have taken place on 26.06.2025, whereas the F.I.R. has been lodged on 29.06.2025 and no explanation has been given for the said delay.

5. Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

5. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the facts that there is general and omnibus allegation, injury being simple in nature, the delay of three days in lodging the F.I.R. and also the fact that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/ successor Court in connection with Andar P.S. Case No.191 of 2025, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the B.N.S.S.

(Soni Shrivastava, J) Trivedi/- U T