Sunita Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.67953 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-141 Year-2019 Thana- CHAND District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== SUNITA KUMARI D/O Keshav Rai, W/o- Santosh Rai Resident of VillageLohadan, Police Station- Chand, District- Kaimur (Bhabua). ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar.

2.

The S.P. , Vigilance Investigation Bureau, Patna Bihar. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Mrigendra Pratap Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ajay Mishra ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 24-10-2019 Petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of her arrest in connection with Chand P.S. Case No. 141 of 2019, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120 (B) of the Indian Penal Code.

As per F.I.R. there is allegation against the petitioner is that petitioner has obtained appointment as Panchyat teacher on the basis of forged documents.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that she has already suffered a lot as she has been suspended from service and is ready to abide by any condition imposed on her.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, considering the above

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67953 of 2019(2) dt.24-10-2019 2/2 submission, this application allowed. Let the petitioner, above named, in the event of her arrest or surrender before the Court below within six weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-IV Kaimur at Bhabua, in connection with Chand P.S. Case No.-141 of 2019, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and further condition is that one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the Court concerned. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) T.Kr./- U T