Patna High CourtCR. MISC./20648/2018allowed

Rajeev Thakur v. The State Of Bihar

2018-04-26Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.20648 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -524 Year- 2017 Thana -KHAGARIA District- KHAGARIA ====================================================== Rajeev Thakur, Son of Nand Lal Thakur, resident of VillageParmanandpur, P.S. Muffasil, District- Khagaria. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mrityunjay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rajkishore Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 26-04-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

Petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Khagaria (Muffasil) P.S.Case No. 524 of 2017 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 384, 420, 467, 468, 471, 504 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation as per FIR is that accused persons came to the office of the informant and demanded Rangdari, stating that as they have purchase land, they have to pay Rangdari. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner is only a witness in the sale deed executed in favor of the accused persons, and no more allegation is attributed against him.

Heard learned APP also.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.20648 of 2018 (2) dt.26-04-2018 2/2 Having heard both sides and in the facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria, in connection with Khagaria (Muffasil) P.S.Case No. 524 of 2017, G.R. No. 2229 of 2017, subject to the conditions under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and further condition that one of the bailors shall be a local person having sufficient immoveable properties within the jurisdiction of court concerned.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U