Chhotan @ Chhotan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.67525 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-884 Year-2021 Thana- BIHTA District- Patna ====================================================== CHHOTAN @ CHHOTAN KUMAR SON OF DAMODAR RAI RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- SADISOPUR (NEAR STATION), P.S.- BIHTA, DISTRICTPATNA ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Kamlesh Kumar Pathak, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Pranav Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 07-04-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Bihta P.S. Case No.884 of 2021 registered under Sections 341, 323, 307, 427 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has falsely been implicated in this case due to village politics. There is no specific allegation against the petitioner. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner stating that the petitioner and other accused persons are specifically alleged to have assaulted the informant with iron rod causing head injury to

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67525 of 2022(4) dt.07-04-2023 2/2 which the injury report also corroborates.

Therefore, the petitioner does not deserve anticipatory bail. Having considered the above facts and circumstances of the case as well as the nature of allegation made against the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, his prayer for bail is rejected. Harish/- (Arvind Srivastava, J) U T