← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./67728/2025bail granted

Rahul Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-09-24Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.67728 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-182 Year-2025 Thana- BODHGAYA District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.

Rahul Kumar S/o Pahari Manjhi R/o Village - Taridih, P.S - Bodhgaya, District - Gaya 2.

Buchchan Kumar @ Dev Kumar S/o Dura Manjhi R/o Village - Taridih, P.S - Bodhgaya, District - Gaya 3.

Deepak Kumar @ Dipak Kumar Manjhi S/o Durga Manjhi R/o Village - Taridih, P.S - Bodhgaya, District - Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners :

Mr. Ajay Kumar Sinha, Advocate Ms. Varsha Verma, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Anish Chandra, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 24-09-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 191(2), 190, 303(2), 109 and 3(5) of the B.N.S..

3. As per prosecution case, it is alleged that 14 F.I.R. named accused persons, including these petitioners along with 15 to 20 unknown persons, assaulted son of informant and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67728 of 2025(2) dt.24-09-2025 2/3 snatched cash of Rs. 5,000/- and mobile phone.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. Allegation of assault is general and omnibus and no specific accusation of overt act has been alleged against these petitioners. Doctor has opined the injuries, sustained by the injured, as simple in nature. Petitioners claim clean antecedents.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, general and omnibus nature of accusation, nature of injuries sustained by the injured and clean antecedents of the petitioners, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners is allowed.

7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Gaya in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67728 of 2025(2) dt.24-09-2025 3/3 connection with Bodhgaya P.S. Case No. 182 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T