Gopal Ram @ Gopal Chandrabanshi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.62126 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-177 Year-2019 Thana- KARAKAT District- Rohtas ====================================================== 1.

GOPAL RAM @ GOPAL CHANDRABANSHI Son of Bihari Ram @ Bihar Ram Resident of Village-Mohanpur, P.S-Karakat, District-Rohtas. 2.

Laljee Kahar @ Laljee Ram Son of Late Nanhak Kahar Resident of VillageMohanpur, P.S-Karakat, District-Rohtas. 3.

Geeta Devi Wife of Gopal Ram @ Gopal Chandrabanshi Resident of Village-Mohanpur, P.S-Karakat, District-Rohtas. 4.

Godhan Ram @ Gopal Ram Son of Sukhraj Ram Resident of VillageMohanpur, P.S-Karakat, District-Rohtas. 5.

Judge Ram Son of Sukhraj Ram Resident of Village-Mohanpur, P.S-Karakat, District-Rohtas.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Krishna Pd. Singh, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Saket Kr. Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Pramod Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 30-09-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Karakat P.S.Case No.177/19 , registered for offences punishable under Sections 307, 353, 427, 504, 325, 326, 337, 332, 333, 147, 148, 149 of the Indian Penal Code. As per FIR, the police got information that the petitioner nos. 1 and 3 have kept liquor in their house, raided their house and arrested the petitioner no.3 but the accused persons including the petitioner nos. 1, 2, 4 and 5 assembled there and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.62126 of 2019(2) dt.30-09-2019 2/3 obstructed the police party and got the said Geeta Devi (petitioner no.3) freed.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that as a lady was arrested without having any warrant of arrest as such the occurrence took place and there is general allegation against the petitioners.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, so far the petitioner no.1 and 3, above named, are concerned, I am not inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to them and they may surrender and pray for regular bail.

So far the petitioner nos. 2, 4 and 5, above named, are concerned, let the petitioner nos.2, 4 and 5 , above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned ACJM, Bikramganj, District Rohtas in connection with Karakat P.S.Case No.177 of 2019, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.62126 of 2019(2) dt.30-09-2019 3/3 With the above direction, this application is disposed of.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T