← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./69630/2022dismissed

Awadhesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2023-03-27Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.69630 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-316 Year-2014 Thana- MUZAFFARPUR SADAR DistrictMuzaffarpur ====================================================== AWADHESH KUMAR Son of Late Satatya Narain Rai Mohalla- Anuradha, Market ke Pichha P.S- Sadar, Dist- Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Upendra Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Uday Pratap Singh, APP.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 27-03-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 295, 435, 395, 353 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegedly, four unknown persons stopped the truck of the informant and looted money on point of pistols. The looters shouted butcher-butcher upon which nearby people arrived and assaulted the informant side.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. No such occurrence as alleged ever took place. He has been falsely implicated in this case due to ulterior motive. The allegation

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69630 of 2022(4) dt.27-03-2023 2/2 leveled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. The FIR has been lodged against 16 named and 100-132 unknown persons including the petitioner. It is further submitted that no any incriminating article has been recovered from the house of the petitioner. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application. Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that petitioner was also involved in the present case. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well the nature of the offence, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The prayer for bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) divyanshi/- U T