Vishal @ Vishal Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.4622 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-565 Year-2021 Thana- DIGHA District- Patna ====================================================== VISHAL @ VISHAL SINGH SON OF ASHOK SINGH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- RAMJEE CHAK, DIGHA, PS- DIGHA, DIST- PATNA ... ... Appellant/s
Versus
1 .
The State of Bihar 2.
RAM BABU SON OF MOTI LAL RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- RAMJEE CHAK, PS- DIGHA, DIST- PATNA ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant/s :
Mr. Harendra Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Sadanand Paswan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 13-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. This appeal has been filed for setting aside order dated 01.08.2023 passed in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 366 A of the Indian Penal Code whereby the prayer for anticipatory bail of the appellant has been rejected.
3 . As per the prosecution case , on 30.09.2021 daughter of informant went for shopping and did not return . While searching his son he received a whatsapp message that his sister was with the petitioner and would return the next day but she did not return .
4. It is submitted that it is a case of love affair. Victim
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.4622 of 2023(7) dt.13-02-2025 2/2 is major. Both have solemnized marriage in Arya Samaj, On 22.07.2021 , a certificate was also issued from Arya Samaj . The family members of the informant was not happy with the present marriage as it was inter caste marriage and therefore this false and concocted case has been lodged against appellant. 5 . Learned counsel for the respondent No. 2 opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that victim in her statement recorded under Section 164 Cr. P C has supported the prosecution case wherein the victim has categorically stated that this petitioner forcibly seated her in car and took her to Patna in a hotel and confined her.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts, I do not find any reason to interfere with the impugned order, accordingly this appeal is dismissed.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Koushik/- U