Nand Kishore Sah v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.74831 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-15 Year-2018 Thana- ECONOMIC OFFENCES, BIHAR District- Patna ====================================================== NAND KISHORE SAH S/o Sri Amerika Sah R/o- New S.B.I. Colony, Digha, P.S.- Digha, District- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
THE STATE OF BIHAR 2.
S.P Economic Offences Unit Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Rama Kant Sharma, Sr. Advocate Mr.Ravindra Kumar Shukla Mr. Pratyush Pratap Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Uma Shankar Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 11-01-2023 The learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove all the defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter within one month.
Heard Mr. Rama Kant Sharma, the learned Sr.
Counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. The learned Sr. Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that, though on earlier occasion, the anticipatory bail petition of the petitioner was rejected on 20.09.2022, but he has renewed his prayer for anticipatory bail on fresh ground that the condition of son of the petitioner is precarious due to down syndrome and his son is unable to perform his daily routine and
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.74831 of 2022(2) dt.11-01-2023 2/2 it has become the duty of the petitioner to assist his son in his daily routine. He has submitted further that the loan amount is regularly being paid.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is not inclined to consider the anticipatory bail petition of the petitioner once again.
If the petitioner surrenders and seeks regular bail before the court below, that shall be considered and disposed of on the same day, without being prejudiced by this order. With the aforesaid observation, the application stands disposed of.
Office shall ensure that all defects are removed by the petitioner within the stipulated time as provided hereinabove, failing which the matter shall be brought to the notice of this Court.
(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) HR/- U T