Mojahir Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.69088 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-94 Year-2025 Thana- GAUNAHA District- West Champaran ====================================================== Mojahir Ansari S/o Hisarat Ansari R/o vill - Murli Bharahwa, P.S.- Gaunaha, Distt.- West Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Bimlesh Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Gauri Shankar Gupta, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 07-10-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Gaunaha P.S. Case No. 94 of 2025 instituted for the offence under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109(1), 351(2), 352 & 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3.

The informant alleged that on 16.06.2025, his relatives, armed with lathi, danda, farsa, and iron rods, attacked him, his father, and other family members over a pathway dispute near their hand pump. His father suffered severe head injuries, and several others, including the informant, were also injured. The accused allegedly threatened to kill them if they lodged a complaint.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69088 of 2025(2) dt.07-10-2025 2/3 4.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 25.06.2025. Petitioner bears four criminal antecedents, as per disclosure made in paragraph No. 3 of the bail application.

5.

It has been further submitted by the petitioner's counsel that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner allegedly assaulted the father of the informant by means of farsa, but injury is found to be simple in nature. There is case and counter case between the parties. Learned counsel submits that there is subsisting land dispute between the parties. Charge sheet has already been submitted in this case. 6.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. 7.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, period of custody of the petitioner and charge sheet being submitted, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

8.

Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Gaunaha P.S. Case

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69088 of 2025(2) dt.07-10-2025 3/3 No. 94 of 2025.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Raj Kishore/- U T